Filed Under (Affiliate Marketing) by Dave Riggs on March-1-2008

One phrase that I’ve seen a lot lately is ROI, or return on investment. Many people are basing the success of their marketing on the ROI, and though that is a good way of judging the effectiveness of a particular marketing method, I feel that it’s flawed overall.

The ROI should be a figure that you set as a baseline. For example, one of your goals should be at least a 100% ROI on your next campaign. With that in mind, you can judge the effectiveness of it, and hence determine whether or not your marketing strategy is working out in the way that you predicted. With that type of information, you can then determine if you are going to make any changes.

However, the big figure that you should always be looking at when marketing is your profit. The amount of money that you actually make is much more important than the return on your investment. Think of it like this: if I spent $100 and made $300, that’s a 200% ROI, which is definitely a good ROI. However, if I spent $1,000 and made $2,000, that’s only a 100% ROI. However, the first example yielded $200 in profit, whereas the second yielded $1,000 in profit.

So what’s more important here? $200 profit and 200% ROI, or $1,000 in profit and 100% ROI? Personally, I’d take the $1,000 and the lower ROI simply because, at the end of the day, I have $800 more in my pocket.

The Right Mindset

Focus on creating profit, and once you are doing so, optimize and tweak your campaigns to maximize your conversions and hence the amount that you earn. Affiliate marketing, as a business, is privy to the same risk vs. reward figures as any other business. The fact that it’s done entirely online in an intangible marketplace is irrelevant.

For your next campaign, really consider your total profit figures and not just your ROI. If you’re experiencing a steady 50% ROI, why not spend more to make more?


3 Comments posted on "ROI or Profit?"
Royal Radande on March 1st, 2008 at 10:30 am #

I agree with you. I would definitely rather have a 100% ROI and make a $800 profit instead of a 200% ROI and a $200 profit.

BlueBobbo on March 23rd, 2008 at 7:27 pm #

First, relevant comment… I maximize profits because I have the money to. People who don’t should probably consider maximizing ROI first.

I know some people will “inflate” their revenues by keeping things that bring in a tiny loss of investment (LOI, coined by Konrad), but that makes zero cents (ahahhaha get it, zero sense).

Second, you better be at Ad Tech San Fran.

Dave Riggs on March 25th, 2008 at 11:20 am #

Haha, I hear ya about LOI. Anything I have that’s not profitable I kill as soon as it’s statistically probable that it’ll continue that way. But it’s kind of amazing that some people constantly brag about their revenues - who cares? I’d rather no one knows even remotely what I’m doing except a select few who also share information.

And yes, I (and Max) will be at Ad Tech in SF. Free monies baby! Haha.

Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: