<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AffiliateWeb.org</title>
	<link>http://www.affiliateweb.org</link>
	<description>It's time to get the gears turning...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proven Success With Unique Content by Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2008/04/01/week-of-july-29-2007-proven-success-with-unique-content/#comment-691</link>
		<author>Jay</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 02:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2008/04/01/week-of-july-29-2007-proven-success-with-unique-content/#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Agreed that having a high position in the search engine results is a priority. If you want to make money online you need a steady stream of people who are seeking what you have to offer. Quality content to solve their problems or answer their questions. Enjoyed reading your post. Keep up the fine work. Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed that having a high position in the search engine results is a priority. If you want to make money online you need a steady stream of people who are seeking what you have to offer. Quality content to solve their problems or answer their questions. Enjoyed reading your post. Keep up the fine work. Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ROI or Profit? by Dave Riggs</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2008/03/01/roi-or-profit/#comment-607</link>
		<author>Dave Riggs</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2008/03/01/roi-or-profit/#comment-607</guid>
		<description>Haha, I hear ya about LOI.  Anything I have that's not profitable I kill as soon as it's statistically probable that it'll continue that way.  But it's kind of amazing that some people constantly brag about their revenues - who cares?  I'd rather no one knows even remotely what I'm doing except a select few who also share information.

And yes, I (and Max) will be at Ad Tech in SF.  Free monies baby!  Haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, I hear ya about LOI.  Anything I have that&#8217;s not profitable I kill as soon as it&#8217;s statistically probable that it&#8217;ll continue that way.  But it&#8217;s kind of amazing that some people constantly brag about their revenues - who cares?  I&#8217;d rather no one knows even remotely what I&#8217;m doing except a select few who also share information.</p>
<p>And yes, I (and Max) will be at Ad Tech in SF.  Free monies baby!  Haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ROI or Profit? by BlueBobbo</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2008/03/01/roi-or-profit/#comment-601</link>
		<author>BlueBobbo</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2008/03/01/roi-or-profit/#comment-601</guid>
		<description>First, relevant comment... I maximize profits because I have the money to.  People who don't should probably consider maximizing ROI first.

I know some people will "inflate" their revenues by keeping things that bring in a tiny loss of investment (LOI, coined by Konrad), but that makes zero cents (ahahhaha get it, zero sense).

Second, you better be at Ad Tech San Fran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, relevant comment&#8230; I maximize profits because I have the money to.  People who don&#8217;t should probably consider maximizing ROI first.</p>
<p>I know some people will &#8220;inflate&#8221; their revenues by keeping things that bring in a tiny loss of investment (LOI, coined by Konrad), but that makes zero cents (ahahhaha get it, zero sense).</p>
<p>Second, you better be at Ad Tech San Fran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ROI or Profit? by Royal Radande</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2008/03/01/roi-or-profit/#comment-422</link>
		<author>Royal Radande</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 18:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2008/03/01/roi-or-profit/#comment-422</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. I would definitely rather have a 100% ROI and make a $800 profit instead of a 200% ROI and a $200 profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. I would definitely rather have a 100% ROI and make a $800 profit instead of a 200% ROI and a $200 profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s official: I&#8217;m soon to be unemployed by Royal Radande</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2008/02/18/its-official-im-soon-to-be-unemployed/#comment-398</link>
		<author>Royal Radande</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2008/02/18/its-official-im-soon-to-be-unemployed/#comment-398</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on the 3 weeks' notice. I hope to do the same one day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on the 3 weeks&#8217; notice. I hope to do the same one day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Easy Conversions Via Low Effort Leads by Iphone &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Easy Conversions Via Low Effort Leads</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2008/02/24/easy-converions-via-low-effort-leads/#comment-397</link>
		<author>Iphone &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Easy Conversions Via Low Effort Leads</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2008/02/24/easy-converions-via-low-effort-leads/#comment-397</guid>
		<description>[...] InterLink Headline News 2.0 wrote an interesting post today on Easy Conversions Via Low Effort LeadsHere&#8217;s a quick excerptTIP: Right now, iPhone offers are converting like mad. My advice would be to use one of those. Step Two: Make a diggable website. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] InterLink Headline News 2.0 wrote an interesting post today on Easy Conversions Via Low Effort LeadsHere&#8217;s a quick excerptTIP: Right now, iPhone offers are converting like mad. My advice would be to use one of those. Step Two: Make a diggable website. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on $50/day in One Hour or Less by Dave Riggs</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2007/12/06/50day-in-one-hour-or-less/#comment-387</link>
		<author>Dave Riggs</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2007/12/06/50day-in-one-hour-or-less/#comment-387</guid>
		<description>This works on both incentivized and non-incentivized campaigns.  If a campaign is incentivized, that means you can give users incentives to fill out the offer.  For example, you could say "If you fill out this offer, we'll give you a chance to win a $100 gift card!"  However, generally the payout is lower on these because the advertiser may assume that the user may be just as interested in the incentive as the offer itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This works on both incentivized and non-incentivized campaigns.  If a campaign is incentivized, that means you can give users incentives to fill out the offer.  For example, you could say &#8220;If you fill out this offer, we&#8217;ll give you a chance to win a $100 gift card!&#8221;  However, generally the payout is lower on these because the advertiser may assume that the user may be just as interested in the incentive as the offer itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on $50/day in One Hour or Less by Marcel</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2007/12/06/50day-in-one-hour-or-less/#comment-357</link>
		<author>Marcel</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 03:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2007/12/06/50day-in-one-hour-or-less/#comment-357</guid>
		<description>Excuse my newbie question folks... But would this be allowed on affiliate programs where there is a "no incentivized" rule ?  I'm not sure if it's "incentivized"...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse my newbie question folks&#8230; But would this be allowed on affiliate programs where there is a &#8220;no incentivized&#8221; rule ?  I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s &#8220;incentivized&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Authors by Being Creative with Custom Stats and Tracking &#124; AffiliateWeb.org</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliateweb.org/authors/#comment-341</link>
		<author>Being Creative with Custom Stats and Tracking &#124; AffiliateWeb.org</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 07:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.affiliateweb.org/authors/#comment-341</guid>
		<description>[...] program for a living full-time but am slowly starting to realize the value of automating literally everything possible. Why not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] program for a living full-time but am slowly starting to realize the value of automating literally everything possible. Why not [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on $50/day in One Hour or Less by Cameron Martel</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2007/12/06/50day-in-one-hour-or-less/#comment-340</link>
		<author>Cameron Martel</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.affiliateweb.org/2007/12/06/50day-in-one-hour-or-less/#comment-340</guid>
		<description>He's referring to AdWords Dave, where the CTR is much higher (comparatively speaking).  I experience CTR's in the 6-8% range on highly targeted campaigns, versus the 0.30% or higher for Facebook campaigns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s referring to AdWords Dave, where the CTR is much higher (comparatively speaking).  I experience CTR&#8217;s in the 6-8% range on highly targeted campaigns, versus the 0.30% or higher for Facebook campaigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
